Holding Someone’s Difficult State

In our carpool, three kids around the age of seven were upset with a four-year-old because he wouldn’t play with them.

So they would tease him by singing a distorted version of a song they knew would bother him, or complain about him: “He never plays with us. He keeps sleeping all the time.”

It was clear as day to me that their behavior was not making it any more likely that the younger child would play with them. Quite the opposite. Their teasing and complaints were only pushing him further away.

I could also understand where this tendency came from: from us, the adults.

When children don’t behave the way we want them to, we become upset and tell them to be “good kids.” If they still don’t listen, we raise our voices.

Even when our intention is nice—for example, wanting them to treat their younger siblings kindly—we sometimes use a forceful tone to demand that they “be nice.”

And so they learn something from us without our realizing it: that a person with more power can be unkind while demanding kindness from someone with less power.

So when these older children behaved unkindly toward the younger one, I could see that this, too, was partly learned behavior. We, adults, had our role in it.

Since I was aware of our own role in it, I gently told the children that they could try being warmer toward him—make him laugh, play with him, and make him feel comfortable. Gradually, he would want to play with them himself.

I don’t think my advice made much difference. But at least I didn’t add to the negativity.

When the children were frustrated with the younger one, I didn’t become frustrated with them for being frustrated with him.

That, in itself, was satisfying.

Because if I hadn’t noticed my own part in the dynamic, I could easily have become irritated with the older children. And what would I have been doing then?

Becoming upset with them for being upset with someone else.

I am amazed by how often we make exactly the same mistake when trying to correct a mistake in our children.

Today, I was a little off. I hadn’t accomplished much at work, and when I came home, I wasn’t really enjoying myself with the kids. I was quiet and straight-faced.

As the kids left the room, my spouse said, “Be a little nicer with the kids. Why are you so serious with them?”

I was already feeling off, and a part of me immediately wanted something different from her. I wanted her to notice that I wasn’t myself and ask me what was wrong. I wanted to be met with warmth rather than a request to change my behavior.

In other words, I wanted someone to hold me in my offness.

And then came the interesting part.

I felt like complaining to her for complaining to me.

“Can’t you be helpful? Can’t you see that I’m upset? Instead of helping me, you’re eager to complain.”

I could feel myself preparing the argument in my head.

But then I saw the pattern.

She was responding to something in me that she didn’t like. And my instinct was to respond to something in her that I didn’t like.

I was about to do exactly what I had just observed in the children.

They were upset that the younger child wouldn’t play with them, so they teased him. I was upset that my spouse had complained to me, so I wanted to complain about her complaint.

Different circumstances. Same pattern.

Someone is in a difficult state. We don’t know how to hold it, so we resist it. The other person then feels hurt or frustrated by our response, and responds in kind.

And before long, each person’s negativity is feeding the other’s.

I caught myself before adding another layer to it.

She has held me with warmth on many occasions, just as I have failed to do so on many occasions. We are both capable of getting caught in this pattern.

The worthwhile question for me is: can I become someone who doesn’t contribute to it?

Can I hold someone in their difficult state without immediately trying to correct it, resist it, or make them feel bad for being there?

That is what it means to develop a deep well of positivity.

And if we can become such people, our children will learn something far more powerful than any instruction to “be nice.”

When someone doesn’t want to play with them, they may not tease him or complain about him.

They may simply approach him with warmth and playfulness.

Not because we told them to.

But because that is what they have seen us do.

Tuesdays

The new art teacher had joined only that morning.

One by one, the children walked to her desk, each carrying a drawing they had made over the weekend.

Some walked proudly. Some hurried. Some couldn’t wait to explain every little detail.

When her turn came, the little girl held her paper tightly against her chest.

She stood in front of the teacher for a moment before placing it on the desk.

Before the teacher could even look at it, the words tumbled out.

“I know it’s not very good.”

The teacher looked up.

“I’m really terrible at drawing.”

The teacher glanced at the drawing.

There was a small bird perched on the branch of a tree. The tree leaned a little too much to one side. The bird’s wings were uneven. The sun looked more like a yellow flower than the sun.

The teacher smiled.

“Tell me about the bird.”

The little girl looked confused.

“The… bird?”

“Yes.”

“Well…” She looked at the drawing again. “It lives in that tree.”

“Does it?”

The little girl nodded.

“It likes sitting there because no one bothers it.”

The teacher listened quietly.

“And does it have a name?”

The little girl thought for a moment.

“I don’t know.”

“I think every bird deserves a name.”

The little girl smiled for the first time.

“I’ll think of one.”

“I’ll be waiting.”

The teacher handed the drawing back.

“Oh,” she added, “next week, let’s see if we can help this tree stand a little straighter.”

The little girl looked at the tree.

“It does lean a lot.”

“It does.”

They both laughed.


The following Tuesday, the little girl was among the last to walk to the teacher’s desk.

She unfolded her drawing.

Before the teacher could say anything, she shrugged.

“It still isn’t very good.”

The teacher looked at the picture.

“I see the bird again.”

The little girl smiled.

“His name is Pip.”

“Pip.” The teacher nodded thoughtfully. “He seems to have found a friend.”

The little girl looked pleased.

“That’s his sister.”

“I was wondering why there were two birds.”

The teacher looked at the nest they were sitting beside.

“I wonder how we could make this nest look softer.”

The little girl leaned over the drawing.

“Maybe… more little sticks?”

“Let’s try that.”

They spent the next few minutes adding tiny twigs to the nest.


Weeks passed.

Every Tuesday, the little girl came with another drawing.

Every Tuesday, before the teacher had even looked at it, she found a different way to apologise.

“I couldn’t draw the cat.”

“The flowers look funny.”

“I messed up the sky.”

The teacher never argued.

She simply looked at the drawing.

Sometimes she noticed something that had improved.

Sometimes she showed the little girl one thing they could practise together the following week.

Sometimes they spent more time inventing stories about Pip than talking about drawing at all.

Without either of them noticing, Tuesdays became the little girl’s favourite day of the week.


One afternoon, the art teacher announced that the school would be sending three drawings to an inter-school competition.

The children gathered excitedly around the noticeboard.

Three names were written on it.

The little girl’s wasn’t.

She looked at the list for a long moment.

Then she quietly folded the drawing she had been holding and slipped it back into her folder.

As the classroom emptied, she stayed behind, putting the crayons back into their boxes.

The teacher came over carrying a tray of paintbrushes.

“I’m glad you’re still here,” she said. “Would you help me wash these?”

The little girl nodded.

They stood side by side at the sink.

“Do you think Pip would like swimming?” the teacher asked.

The little girl laughed.

“He’d be terrible at it.”

“Probably.”

“He’d fall straight into the water.”

“And complain all afternoon.”

The little girl giggled.

“He’d blame his sister.”

“Naturally.”

“He’d tell everyone he was pushed.”

“Was he?”

The little girl thought about it.

“No.”

She turned a brush over in her hands.

“Why didn’t you choose my drawing?”

The teacher dried another brush before answering.

“Because I thought the other three were ready for the competition.”

The little girl stared at the water swirling around the brushes.

The teacher passed her another brush.

“So next Tuesday…”

“Next Tuesday,” the teacher said, “…let’s see what Pip gets up to next.”


Winter arrived.

The trees outside the classroom had lost most of their leaves.

Pip disappeared for a few weeks.

“He has gone somewhere warmer,” the little girl explained.

“I don’t blame him,” the teacher said, rubbing her hands together.

The little girl laughed.

One Tuesday she brought a drawing of a house.

The windows weren’t straight. The roof leaned. One chimney seemed to be floating in the air.

She placed it on the desk.

The teacher waited.

The little girl looked at the drawing.

Then back at the teacher.

“I think the roof is crooked.”

The teacher looked at her.

“What do you think we could do about it?”

The little girl picked up her pencil.

“I could erase this line.”

She paused.

“Or maybe leave it and remember next time.”

The teacher smiled.

“Those both sound like good ideas.”


The Tuesday after that, the teacher had a cold.

She had been at the school since seven that morning.

The children queued at her desk as usual.

When the little girl’s turn came, she put her drawing down.

“I couldn’t do the sky.”

The teacher looked at it.

“Mm.”

She reached for the next drawing in the pile.

“Leave it here. I’ll look properly later.”

The little girl stood there a moment longer.

Then she went back to her seat.

The following Tuesday, the teacher was at the door before the bell, sorting paper into stacks.

“There you are,” she said. “Has Pip come back yet?”

The little girl hesitated.

“Not yet.”

“Well. He’d better hurry.”

The little girl unfolded her drawing and put it on the desk without saying anything about it.


A few days later, the teacher was drawing on the blackboard.

The children watched eagerly.

She began sketching a horse.

Its body looked fine.

Its head was much too small.

One leg was longer than the others.

Then, almost absent-mindedly, she added another leg.

And then another.

The classroom burst into laughter.

“It has six legs!” someone shouted.

The teacher stepped back and pretended to study it seriously.

“Hmm.”

She nodded.

“I appear to have discovered a very unusual horse.”

The little girl laughed so hard that she had to wipe tears from her eyes.

The teacher picked up the duster and wiped it away.

“Let’s try again.”

That afternoon, while walking home, the little girl kept thinking about the horse.

Not because it had six legs.

But because the teacher had simply smiled, wiped it away, and drawn another one.


Spring arrived.

Pip came back.

He had a family now.

The little girl had drawn three tiny chicks peeking out of the nest.

The teacher looked at them one by one.

“I think this one is the mischievous one.”

The little girl pointed to the chick with feathers sticking up in every direction.

“That’s Pebble.”

“And these two?”

“They don’t have names yet.”

“You’d better think of some before next Tuesday.”

“I will.”


A few weeks later, the class was practising hands.

Everyone found them difficult.

The fingers were too long.

Or too short.

Sometimes there were four.

Sometimes there were six.

The classroom was filled with groans.

“I’ve ruined it.”

“I’m hopeless at this.”

“My hand looks like a spider.”

The little girl looked down at her own page.

One hand was much bigger than the other.

She stared at it for a moment.

The teacher happened to be passing.

She stopped beside the desk.

“What are you thinking?”

The little girl looked at the page.

“I’m—”

She stopped.

“This hand needs another try.”

“The bigger one?”

“Yes.”

The teacher walked on.

The little girl picked up her eraser.


The school year was almost over.

On the last Tuesday before the holidays, the children spread their drawings across the classroom floor.

The teacher walked slowly from one picture to the next.

She paused beside the little girl’s.

Pip was still there.

The tree stood straighter now.

The branches had shape.

The nest looked soft.

The wings were more carefully drawn than they had been months ago.

The teacher smiled.

“You’ve been practising.”

“I have.”

“What was the hardest thing?”

“The wings.”

“And what was the most fun?”

The little girl thought for a moment.

“Making up stories.”

The teacher laughed.

“I thought you might say that.”

The bell rang.

The children gathered their bags and rushed towards the door.

The little girl reached the doorway.

Then she turned around.

“Sesame and Fig,” she said.

“Sorry?”

“The other two chicks.”

The teacher considered this.

“Fig is a good name for a bird.”

“I know.”

Then she was gone down the corridor.

The teacher stood in the classroom for a while.

Then she began gathering the drawings from the floor.

The last letter from a father

Hello, my loved ones. Hugs and kisses. 

You’re going to read this letter after I die. I want to focus on something specific in this: my mediocrity.

By social standards, I did not achieve “excellence.” I did not garner grand success in my career, nor did I accrue tremendous wealth. I did not “scale” my life to help thousands of people. My impact remained limited; I was heard by only a few, and the quality of my work never exceeded a certain level of worldly clarity or renown. By many metrics, I remained average.

But do not think I am dying with any pain or regret because of this. 

I want to tell you that my success—the way I defined it—lay in being completely at peace with that mediocrity. Because you love me, you might argue that I achieved a different kind of excellence simply by being so comfortable not fulfilling social standards. I am not sure what to call it.

But here is what I have understood about life: How can anything be truly mediocre if everything is a piece of the Divine?

If the Creator is in everything, how can there be mediocrity? The concept of “mediocrity” lies only in the minds of people who haven’t tasted, experienced, or understood Divinity. 

Have I experienced the divine? I don’t know. But I have experienced some level of joy, contentment, and peace. Was that Divinity? How do I know? I only know that what I experienced was valuable to me, and I would never exchange it for worldly excellence.

A father who loves his children can only wish for them the highest that he has seen. So, I wish for you this: Whether you achieve excellence by social standards or remain “ordinary” in the eyes of the world, may you experience this Joy. May you have peace and contentment.

I hope that you listen to Kirtan.

I hope that you listen to Gurbani.

More than that, I hope you understand Gurbani. I hope your experience of the Divine is real—that you are not limited to just an intellectual understanding, but that you actually taste it in your life. I hope this feeling grows so big within you that you help others taste it, too.

Finally, I want to ask you: How will you respond to someone who calls your father a mediocre person?

Would you like to know how I wish you would respond?

I wish that you would respond with agreement. Smile and say:

“Yes, he was. And he was completely fine, at peace, and even joyful being that way. While you see his mediocrity, we also see what was way beyond that. And not just him, no human being can be measured by what he accomplished or failed to accomplish in this world.”

Your father 

Is the universe rigged against us?

When you need a bus, it isn’t there; at other times, they are all around you. A stock goes up only after you sell it. When you try to sell your house, the prices are down; when you try to buy, the prices are up.

These are some of the ideas I have heard multiple times from my neighbors and relatives.

Can you identify the common theme here?

“The universe is against me.”

In their minds, this isn’t just a complaint; it is a law. This is how things work. It feels obvious. And when someone says such things, others readily agree.

Are we significant enough that the universe cares one way or the other about us?

And if the universe does care about what happens in our lives, why is it against us?

Here’s what’s interesting: many religions and spiritual traditions suggest the opposite: that our world reflects our thoughts and beliefs. That we’re creators, not victims. If so, the universe works with us, not against us.

So, if that’s true, why does it really seem that the universe is stacked against us?

Two reasons:

First, we are biased in our observations. We are more likely to pay attention to the absence of the bus when we want it; if it is absent at other times, we won’t notice it. Similarly, we are more likely to pay attention to a stock that goes up after we sell it. It can generate strong emotions of missed opportunity. And the stronger the emotions associated with a memory, the more likely we are to remember it.

Second, there is something oddly comforting about believing that we live in a world rigged against us. It allows us to attribute the messiness of our lives to universal forces and take pride in merely surviving. We need the universe to be against us so that we don’t have to confront our own role in shaping our lives.

But there is another way to live.

To believe in a universe stacked in our favour. To believe in our agency to change our lives. To take responsibility without self-blame, and without blaming others. To focus less on what we don’t want and more on what we do want and to channel our energy in that direction.

Perhaps this is a more helpful, and happier, way to live.

You are not born to shine; you shone even before you were born.

There is a saying that you are born to shine. Of course, everybody is trying to shine, to stand out, to become something big. But I see within me a longing to make peace with remaining small. It is almost as if some part of me is not very comfortable with not being at peace with remaining small.

This part wonders: What is the problem with remaining small? All the counters that come up against remaining small are the ones that are socially gathered, not originated from my deep self. 

All this craving to become someone big—by doing something great—is born out of the idea that I am not a piece of the Divine. Because if I am a piece of the Divine, then I am complete the way I am. There is nothing to become. The story is finished, and I can be at peace right now.

At this moment, I’m trying to make peace with remaining small, and that seems to be a step in the right direction.

Society has sold this idea in a significant way that very naturally, subconsciously, I crave to become big, I crave to do something great, and I call this my desire. But is it really my desire? Or is it something that has become a part of me because I have been constantly exposed to messages from outside?

In a weird way, I sense that there is something big about being comfortable being small. Perhaps, one can shine by becoming completely at peace with being small. 

Just to be clear, this peace is not about giving in. This peace is about “recognizing” that there is nothing wrong, nothing deficient in remaining small; that small is as much a reflection of the Source as big is. This peace comes from a deeper well within that originates from a belief in or the knowledge of the source of life.

Is possessing a virtue virtuous?

The virtuosity of a virtue dies when it becomes a “virtue.”

Joy is not a virtue, nor is service, nor is humility.

These are qualities that spring forth out of one’s being as it touches the truth.

The one who imbibes these as “virtues” possesses their bodies without the souls.

My wish for my son

Not a good man

I want you to be

Because what does a good man do?

What’s good in the eyes of the society. 

But the society is lost. 

Its lostness reflects in its misery

So, becoming a good man

is a recipe for becoming a miserable one

How can I wish this for you?

What do I wish for you?

That you be a happy man inside out. 

How does one become that?

My life reflects my not having the answer. 

So, find the answer

And be happy 

And then lead me there. 

The Paradoxical Way of the Universe

In this world, people believe that unless you ask, you don’t get.

So they keep asking. They keep reaching. They never show that they’re satisfied or happy with what they already have. They aspire—and not just aspire, but push—for more.

But the universe works in paradoxical ways.

The more dissatisfied you are, the more ‘lack’ you attract.

The more grateful you are, the more abundance finds you.

The moment you say, “I have enough. what more can I ask for?” you’re showered with even more.

When you keep asking, you affirm lack.

Because every act is creative – both the act of asking and the thought beneath it: I don’t have enough.

While asking carries doubt, the belief in lack carries conviction.

And so life unfolds – full of lack, with only small glimpses of fulfilment.

My 38th birthday

This post captures the thoughts I had on my recent birthday.

ਸਾਧੋ ਰਚਨਾ ਰਾਮ ਬਨਾਈ ॥
Seekers: See, the Lord has fashioned such a creation.
ਇਕਿ ਬਿਨਸੈ ਇਕ ਅਸਥਿਰੁ ਮਾਨੈ ਅਚਰਜੁ ਲਖਿਓ ਨ ਜਾਈ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥
One person passes away while another thinks that he will live forever – this is a wonder beyond understanding!

This Gurbani shabad resonates deeply today. Yesterday, I heard Sadhguru share that if we remained conscious of our mortality, we would only do what truly matters to us. Life, he said, would then be wonderful.

Today, I am one year farther from my birth and one year closer to my death. This makes me wonder: if I truly lived with this awareness, how would I be different?

What would I drop?

What would I pick up?

Or, perhaps, the real question is: how deeply and patiently would I strive to know myself, sans the ‘outside noise’ I have gathered over years, or even lifetimes?

I see within me a strong, compulsive urge to do—to just do something—even though I lack clarity on what I truly want or why. I recognize this urge as a consequence of my insecurities and ingrained belief systems: the belief that I must keep doing.

It’s as if my life is unjustified if I just sit idle.

As if what I do is more important than “I”.

As if what I gather is more important than “I”.

The truth is, it’s not just that people around me wouldn’t let me sit idle for long. It’s that I would agree with their logic. It’s not that they are lost; it’s that I am also lost, not yet grounded enough in myself to disagree with them for long.

So, amidst this shared lostness, we all roam. We celebrate our birthdays and continue living the lives we live. Year by year, the day of death gets closer, but we live as if we will live forever.

This, as Gurbani says, truly is the wonder beyond understanding.

The desire to be unconditionally accepted

Expecting others who have not accepted many parts of themselves to unconditionally accept me is obviously not going to work. 

I need to unconditionally accept myself first. From that unconditional acceptance will spring an acceptance of others’ conditional acceptance. 

And when I accept even their conditional acceptance, I will also accept their whole selves unconditionally. 

From my unconditional acceptance will they gather the courage to accept the parts of themselves that they have rejected for long. 

And by accepting those parts will they arrive at a stage where they will unconditionally accept themselves. 

And from that unconditional acceptance of self will emerge unconditional acceptance of others. 

I am waiting for others to change. And perhaps, they are waiting for me to change. 

And once I change, the whole universe will begin to change. 

It doesn’t mean that I am special. It means that the parts of universe are intimately connected with each other. 

No more posts to show